HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine Trial for Treating COVID-19 Disappoints (16th April)

“The best available evidence does not support the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19.”

HCQ – hydroxychloroquine

Source: RONALD BAILEY – 16th April 2020
Click here

A just-reported Chinese study compares the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine with those of patients receiving standard of care. The results, alas, are disappointing.

I summarized that study in my roundup yesterday of COVID-19 therapeutic research, pointing out that this randomized controlled trial of 150 patients “found no difference in the rate of viral load reduction or symptom alleviation between the group treated with hydroxychloroquine and the one that had not been.” Now the University of Vermont pulmonologist Josh Farkas has published his own analysis of the results, delving more deeply into the data.

The patients in both arms of the study were well-matched demographically and clinically, Farkas notes. Most suffered relatively mild cases of the disease, and treatment was initiated fairly late—about 16 to 17 days after disease onset. Twenty-eight days into the trial, the researchers found essentially no difference between the two cohorts with respect to the percent of patients in which the virus was undetectable.

Does it work? NOPE!

Farkas adds:

This endpoint most directly addresses the question: does hydroxychloroquine exert anti-viral activity in vivo? The answer seems to be: nope. Even if the drug were administered too late to affect the clinical course of the infection, if it exerted any anti-viral activity then we might expect to see that effect here. If anything, there might be a trend towards delayed viral clearance in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine.

The study also found that fever and respiratory symptoms did not abate any faster in patients who had been treated with hydroxychloroquine.

Farkas acknowledges the study’s limits, including its small size and that the researchers were not blinded—that is, they knew which patients were being given the treatment. “Nonetheless,” he says, “this study currently represents the highest available quality of evidence regarding hydroxychloroquine.”

Conclusion: “.. the best available evidence does not support the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19…”

“For now, the best available evidence does not support the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19,” Farkas concludes. “It seems prudent to restrict the use of hydroxychloroquine to randomized controlled studies for the time being.” He does acknowledge that future studies in which COVID-19 patients are treated earlier in the course of their infections may yet find that hydroxychloroquine offers some therapeutic benefits. Fingers crossed.


Other News -HCQ-


HCQ: Fox News falls out of love with hydroxychloroquine (22nd April)


HCQ: Study finds no benefit, higher death rate in patients taking hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 (22nd April)


HCQ: What do you have to lose taking hydroxychloroquine for coronavirus? Potentially your life. (13th April)


HCQ: Trump is wrong in so many ways about hydroxychloroquine studies. Here are the facts… (11th April)


HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is Trump’s coronavirus / COVID-19 wonder drug — but does it work? (7th April)